The Importance of History :: World History

The Importance of narration Can anything worthwhile be gained from move research into historical events?History seen as study of the past is an constituent(a) part of many education systems across the world. Many countries spend gigantic amounts of money and resources to uncover their past. Every year new and new historical sites are uncovered, excavations on those sites are conducted and the result are studied by archeologists without the world. But have we gained anything worthwhile from research into the past? The solving seems clear Yes, we have. The Study of account especially into historical battles and wars is beneficial when non vital for the evolution of warfare in the new-fangled world. Military strategists continually study wars such as the World Wars, the Napoleonic Conflicts and many modern wars. Tactics and strategies are analyzed and continuously refined, so as to modify their effectiveness and efficacy in future conflicts, without historical study into confl icts, sophisticated warfare tactics prevalent today would never have evolved from those lowbred tactics man used to use in wars. Many countries straightaway are trying to acquire Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), as history has convincingly displayed their awesome destructive power, and their potential to deter aggressions and conflicts thrust upon on a country, like the Cold war remained cold because both countries had WMD and were awake of the consequences if they were used. Another example were historical research is vital is the judicial system. History sets precedents of judicial cases, which are studied by judges to before they cast decision in similar cases themselves. The effectiveness of certain punishments for offences is also evaluated through history. Thus we study history in order to learn from it, cleanse our past experiences and avoid repeating past mistakes. besides this is not always the case. When World war one broke out in atomic number 63, The Empires of Germany, Austro-Hungarian and the Ottoman, were fighting against the axis France, Britain, and Italy. The result of this conflict was total destruction for all of Europe. However just after 20 years, the same nations were getting closer to other military confrontation. Yet again the same nations were allowing Germany to rise militarily, yet again they failed to act soon enough, and yet again they found themselves in some other conflict. Yet again the conflict brought total destruction for Europe. What went wrong here, why didnt the study of history prevent a cataclysm in Europe when just one had happened 2 or 3 decades ago?